Links
Archives
- August 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
- July 2005
- June 2005
- May 2005
- April 2005
- March 2005
- February 2005
- January 2005
- December 2004
- November 2004
- October 2004
- September 2004
- July 2004
- June 2004
- May 2004
- April 2004
- March 2004
- February 2004
- January 2004
- December 2003
- November 2003
- October 2003
- September 2003
- July 2003
- June 2003
- May 2003
What we're reading
Visits
A technology blog for The Economist Group IT team
Friday, January 27, 2006
How to beat the scammers
Take two Rottweilers....full details here.
Comments:
Post a Comment
Can Google make money without doing evil?
The sixth of the 10 things that Google has found to be true may indeed be true, but the wording is clever. It doesn't say that Google will not make money by doing evil and however rationalised the reasons for deploying Google.cn are, the fact remains that profit has come before principles.
The Economist gives a somewhat positive report on the launch, highlighting the drop in share price when Google refused to hand over usage data to the DoJ, but I don't buy it. The simple fact of the matter is that Google wants a site in China that performs well enough for it to be able to maximise revenue from ads and increase market share.
The idea of creating a non-commercial web search engine resurfaced when Google began monetising its service, but that was when Google was good. I wonder if, in five years time, we'll look back at the launch of Google.cn as the beginning of the demise of Google?
The Economist gives a somewhat positive report on the launch, highlighting the drop in share price when Google refused to hand over usage data to the DoJ, but I don't buy it. The simple fact of the matter is that Google wants a site in China that performs well enough for it to be able to maximise revenue from ads and increase market share.
The idea of creating a non-commercial web search engine resurfaced when Google began monetising its service, but that was when Google was good. I wonder if, in five years time, we'll look back at the launch of Google.cn as the beginning of the demise of Google?
Comments:
The Register has spotted that Google have pulled an FAQ saying that they don't censor serach results.
Post a Comment
Using Wikipedia can lose you your job
Especially if you're a reporter and you don't attribute your source.
Comments:
Post a Comment
Wednesday, January 25, 2006
An iPod knows where it's files came from!
An article on CNET reveals as much about the iPod's disk structure as it could about you! Apparantly the MAC address of the source of files on a disk-based iPod are stored along with the data....
Comments:
Post a Comment
Monday, January 23, 2006
Why do I need Windows Vista?
Mano's Blog explains all.
Comments:
Post a Comment
Thursday, January 19, 2006
Moaning and whinging at werk is forbidden
Wow, why didn't I think of this way of removing negative energy!
Comments:
Post a Comment
Wednesday, January 18, 2006
Third party help for iTunes
In TCH recently I wondered why no one has come up with a better way of getting stuff onto iPods than iTunes. Well Walt Mossberg outlined a couple of enhancements recently.
Comments:
Post a Comment
Monday, January 16, 2006
Are cracks appearing at Google?
As Google stock grows in value, seemingly supported by the endless stream of new product launches, are the first signs of weaknesses appearing? At the announcement of "co-operation" between Sun and Google last year Eric Schmidt said that the indexing of non-web content was a big opportunity for Google. By this I took that he meant that monetisation of search results was not limited to the web.
Google's first forays into growing the universe for (Google) search were the Google Toolbar and Google Desktop Search (GDS). The Google Toolbar started this by taking the search functionality away from individual sites. It did this with the introduction of the Current site drop down - no longer do you need to be able to fathom the quirks of each site's search function. GDS took search into the world of corporate and personal data - allowing first local hard drives, then networked drives to be indexed and searched. All with the familiar Google interface.
Both of these products are now looking like they were rushed out and have holes in them that Google do not admit to (unlike the privacy issue with GDS which was fixed). I've noticed this with both tools and in searching for solutions (yes, using Google) have found that I'm by no means alone. The Google toolbar screws up pages that use CSS so that elements appear in the wrong place on the page. Despite apparantly being reported months ago, no fix has been forthcoming. GDS also has problems - most notably that it regularly takes up 100% of the CPU - when this happens it's pretty difficult to even get to Task Manager to kill the process.
Now I'm not saying that Google is doing evil here, but it does shine some light on their testing process. Google Labs and the extended beta of GMail seem to me to indicate that Joe Public is Google's tester and that even when faults are found, they don't get fixed very quickly. Google needs to learn that rushing out half-finished products to perpetuate the PR flow and thus keep the share price propped up isn't going to last for ever. The sooner it realises this the better for us all.
Google's first forays into growing the universe for (Google) search were the Google Toolbar and Google Desktop Search (GDS). The Google Toolbar started this by taking the search functionality away from individual sites. It did this with the introduction of the Current site drop down - no longer do you need to be able to fathom the quirks of each site's search function. GDS took search into the world of corporate and personal data - allowing first local hard drives, then networked drives to be indexed and searched. All with the familiar Google interface.
Both of these products are now looking like they were rushed out and have holes in them that Google do not admit to (unlike the privacy issue with GDS which was fixed). I've noticed this with both tools and in searching for solutions (yes, using Google) have found that I'm by no means alone. The Google toolbar screws up pages that use CSS so that elements appear in the wrong place on the page. Despite apparantly being reported months ago, no fix has been forthcoming. GDS also has problems - most notably that it regularly takes up 100% of the CPU - when this happens it's pretty difficult to even get to Task Manager to kill the process.
Now I'm not saying that Google is doing evil here, but it does shine some light on their testing process. Google Labs and the extended beta of GMail seem to me to indicate that Joe Public is Google's tester and that even when faults are found, they don't get fixed very quickly. Google needs to learn that rushing out half-finished products to perpetuate the PR flow and thus keep the share price propped up isn't going to last for ever. The sooner it realises this the better for us all.
Comments:
Post a Comment
Friday, January 13, 2006
London Underground : The Song
Not very techie, but very funny (also nsfw).London Underground : The Song
Comments:
Post a Comment
Wednesday, January 11, 2006
Sell nothing, make $1,000,000
I can't believe this worked. Alex Tew of Wiltshire, England set up a blank website and charged advertisers $1 per pixel. 1,000,000 pixels and hundreds (thousands?) of ads later, the Million Dollar Homepage was born. Hmmm... does anybody want to buy a bridge?
Comments:
This insane situation has started a goldrush - check out these current auctions on eBay if you want to start your own version and get a piece of the action.
Something tells me this dotcom bubble will burst pretty quickly.
Post a Comment
Something tells me this dotcom bubble will burst pretty quickly.
Hard Drive Killer?
Could flash memory someday replace spinning disks in laptops? In about 5 to 6 years says Steve Appleton, CEO of Micron Technology. Flash memory is faster, generates much less heat and its rate of growth is accelerating past Moore's Law. Appleton concedes though that hard disks will still be needed for storage heavy applications.
Comments:
Post a Comment
Friday, January 06, 2006
Microsoft patch WMF flaw
MIcrosoft brought out a patch ahead of schedule to fix the WMF flaw that hit the headlines last week.
Comments:
Post a Comment
BellSouth signals the start of a two tier internet?
The WSJ (sub. requied) reports that BellSouth is in talks with online movie firms to provide guaranteed delivery of their products over the web. Other telcos are looking at similar deals. Needless to say the likes of Vonage are not keen. Voice telephony is changing, but I'm still not yet convinced it'll all be free.
Comments:
Post a Comment